Print Page   |   Contact Us   |   Sign In   |   Join APTR
APTR Directory Search
Events

10/30/2016
APTR Council of Graduate Programs in Public Health Fall Meeting

4/5/2017 » 4/7/2017
APTR Annual Meeting - Teaching Prevention 2017

Featured Members
Patrick Remington, University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine & Public HealthAssociate Dean for Public Health and Professor of Population Health Sciences

News & Press: APTR Activities

APTR Comments on Proposed CEPH Accreditation Criteria Revisions

Wednesday, September 07, 2016   (0 Comments)
Share |

The Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH) invited review and comment on its 4th draft of proposed accreditation criteria revisions this summer. 

The APTR Council of Graduate Programs in Public Health submitted the following comment requesting reconsideration and revision of the C2-B criterion addressing faculty requirements for concentrations in programs versus schools of public health. At issue is the requirement that programs have three (3) primary instructional faculty for each concentration, while schools need only two (2) primary instructional faculty per concentration who can also count in an additional concentration.  


The Association for Prevention Teaching and Research (APTR) and its Council of Graduate Programs in Public Health is requesting revision of Criterion C2-B of the proposed CEPH accreditation criteria to take into consideration the differing needs and structures of MPH programs.  At issue is the requirement that programs have three (3) primary instructional faculty for each concentration, while schools need only two (2) primary instructional faculty per concentration who can also count in an additional concentration.  This criterion compromises the ability of larger programs to work and compete with schools.

This criterion requires programs to have more faculty than schools in order to offer the same number of concentrations.  We recognize that this criterion may benefit some programs by allowing them to leverage the requirement to preserve or gain faculty resources.  However, it also places demands for resources on other programs that may not desire additional faculty or have the infrastructure to accommodate additional faculty.

While one solution could be to allow programs with more than 21 faculty the option to use the criteria written for schools, CEPH must also consider the needs of those programs that fall shy of the required 21 faculty when revising the criteria.

We strongly urge a reconsideration of Criterion C2-B. At present it is not clear why greater restrictions are being placed on programs.  Thank you for your consideration and action.  We look forward to working with you on this issue.  

Sincerely,

Allison L. Lewis                               David Gregorio, PhD, MS                                    
Executive Director, APTR                 President, APTR
                                                      Director, University of Connecticut MPH Program


The draft criteria can be viewed at: http://ceph.org/assets/Draft_criteria_4.pdf

APTR wishes to thank the many Council members who weighed in on this important process.

 


1001 Connecticut Avenue, NW Suite 610  |  Washington, DC 20036

About APTR | Membership | Education Fund